Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Reports
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Different take

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue two
Winter 2009

The ties that bind – communication
through neckwear


Written by:

  • James Furber, Farrer & Co

The unwary can also fall foul of transatlantic differences. The stripes of a traditional British club tie are higher on the left-hand side, moving down diagonally to the right – but in the United States where Brooks Brothers does a roaring trade in the British look the stripes are cut in the opposite way. English club men wandering through Manhattan are known to be responsible for several cases of mistaken identity.

Some ties appear regularly at certain times of the year. The first day of a Lords “Test” match will bring out MCC ties all over London as wearers broadcast the message on their way to work that they have no intention of staying in the office much past 10:30am so that they can be at the ground in time for an 11:00am start. At other major sporting events, the members of the clubs involved (the All England Club for Wimbledon tennis or the Royal & Ancient for the Open golf) will don their ties as a matter of course, attracting sometimes envious looks from those outside these privileged elites. 

Occasions on which there is no getting out of wearing a tie (a formal wedding, for instance) are especially interesting for students of this sartorial art. Such events evoke in people a desire to wear the tie of which they are most proud, a decision which speaks volumes about the individual if observers have inside knowledge of the options that might have been discarded. 

Old Etonians tend to look upon their own tie as superior to anything else in the neckwear line and interestingly eschew club ties as a class if they are not wearing their own. The tie of the Hawks’ Club (the Cambridge sporting club) is seen much more frequently than that of its Oxford counterpart, the Vincent’s. Perhaps that is because the latter can be confused with the Royal Navy by those who cannot remember whether the crown on such a tie should be silver or gold.

Ties, of course, can be used to good advantage in tight situations. The late Robert Warren, Executive Editor of the News of the World, would when called upon to defend his paper in court in defamation cases wear his “Wavy Navy” (Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve) tie. He was confident that the judge in question, and possibly some of the jury, would take note and realize that Robert, known for many years as “the Admiral,” had been prepared to lay down his life in the service of Queen and country.

There are many other opportunites for ties to make a positive impression, notably at job interviews. Thorough research can establish the antecedents of a particular interviewer, prompting a shrewd interviewee to pick a tie that demonstrates shared allegiance to school, university or sporting institution.

The joy of multiple club membership, another characteristic of the British sporting classes, can produce odd results when it comes to ties. The story goes that four famous cricket clubs were competing one weekend in the English county of Kent – the Eton Ramblers against I Zingari on the Saturday and the Free Foresters against the Butterflies on the Sunday. One might assume that 44 people (four teams of 11) were involved – but while there were 44 ties (and cricket sweaters) on display over the two days the fixtures in fact only required 22 players. It was simply a matter of everyone changing their allegiance (and tie) from one day to the next. 

What of the future? Some say the younger generation, who often decline to wear ties at all, are no longer interested in neckwear as a form of personal communication. We will see. The recent increase in the sale of “school” and “club” socks is perhaps a sign of a new trend in Britain to display social and sporting affiliations on the ankle. 

Read Corporate tie etiquette

Read more 1 | 2

James Furber is Senior Partner of Farrer & Co, a law firm based in London. He is eligible to wear the ties of the Old Westminsters, Gonville and Caius College (striped, coat of arms and summer order), the Cambridge Hawks’ Club, the Old Stymies’ golfing society (Cambridge), Farrers’ Sporting, the Royal and Ancient Golf Club, Royal St George’s Golf Club (stripes and crest), Royal West Norfolk Golf Club, Royal Blackheath Golf Club, Old Westminster Golfing Society, London Solicitors’ Golfing Society, Company of Farrer Golfers (striped and crested), Estates Golfing Society, The Oystercatchers, TAGS, Duchy of Cornwall and Barts Hospital Golden Oldies. Despite this extensive wardrobe he also enjoys the informality of an open-necked shirt.




back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas/Fort Worth
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map