Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Climate perspectives

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue two
Winter 2009

The role of progressive states 
and provinces

Written by:
  • Linda Adams, California Environmental Protection Agency

California has always been an environmental leader. We have been blazing new trails in environmental policy for decades, pushing our federal leaders to adopt initiatives nationwide. From laws that improve our air, ensure water quality, require cleaner cars and now cap global warming pollution, California continues to lead the way toward policies that promote a cleaner environment.

Our progressive leadership may not always have been welcome to national officials concerned with politics and special interests. But our proactive, commonsense approach is finally being embraced in Washington and around the globe.

We believe that there is a role for states and provinces in the global fight against climate change. While our federal governments negotiate the next global climate agreement, we continue to work with our partners around the world to share and implement strategies in areas such as standards and reporting that can bring immediate environmental and economic results. Our new partnership with the United Nations and leaders in Washington means that we can provide subnational support on the road to Copenhagen. 

The debate over climate change is over in California. In 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger declared, “We know the science. We see the threat. And we know the time for action is now.” A year later the Governor committed the state to the first cap on greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Now, many states have joined the effort, creating regional initiatives that span North America. 

The destination is clear. We must limit global temperature rises by reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. But we know we cannot do it alone. This is a global problem that requires a global solution and these regional initiatives help bring us closer to a shared solution that all world leaders can agree on in Copenhagen.

The key to getting successfully to our destination and beyond is shared rules and methods for measuring, reporting and verifying emissions. Efforts such as The Climate Registry, the Western Climate Initiative and the International Carbon Action Partnership, for example, are helping to develop the world’s first shared accounting standard to ensure that a tonne of carbon is measured similarly throughout the world.

While the US and China posture politically ahead of Copenhagen, California and other progressive developed subnational governments are sharing their successes with developing nations.

California has a strong partnership with China’s national government and in 2009 helped launch China’s first-ever voluntary emissions reporting inventory with the support of its national government. Now, the United Nations Development Programme is working with California and other subnational governments to create similar developed – developing relationships around the world. 

With our hands-on help, developing nations can feel more comfortable about making a commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. If we demonstrate our success, then taking action will not seem such a daunting task.

California’s ongoing advocacy for progressive states and provinces, meanwhile, has led to drafting that recognizes the important role of subnational governments. The language was submitted into the official negotiating text for Copenhagen and now appears in more than 100 places. We are confident that the final accord will recognize and support the essential role that states and provinces play.

As part of the growing co-operation between federal and subnational government in the US and elsewhere, California is committed to supporting national leaders as they negotiate a new global agreement. 

Linda Adams has been Secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency since 2006.



back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas/Fort Worth
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map