Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Climate perspectives

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue two
Winter 2009

No short cuts, please

Written by:
  • Stanley Fink, Earth Capital Partners

A terrible irony of climate change is that many of the countries that contributed least to the problem will suffer most, in particular through drought, water scarcity, crop failure and forced migration.

All nations bear a responsibility, but the United States and China (as largest historic and largest future emitters) must take the lead. They can set an admirable example for the rest of the world by showing that entrenched positions are no longer an option, and that co-operation across borders is both possible and essential. 

From a policy perspective, we need pragmatic solutions underpinned by aggressive and binding commitments for carbon reductions. Engaging with the threat of climate change will require political bravery and visionary thinking. There is no room for interim shortcuts and it is crucial that any stimulus packages with regard to, for example, infrastructure, do not lock us into an unsustainable future. 

I would like to see a number of concrete policy outcomes and commitments coming from Copenhagen (COP15) (and beyond). These include:

A proposal that moves towards a global cap and trade framework. Or for fungibility between regional frameworks if the global objective is too hard to achieve in one step.

A proposal that will ultimately include the world’s forests in a global climate protection carbon trading scheme and a supporting policy framework recognizing the importance of forestry and sustainable agricultural/land practices. Emissions from the deforestation of tropical forests contribute some 17 per cent of annual greenhouse gas emissions. Rainforests also sequester almost 20 per cent of man-made CO2 emissions every year in addition to storing water, regulating rainfall, hosting an immensely rich biodiversity and providing income for local communities. Yet deforestation is endemic. Reflecting the carbon embedded in trees and rewarding that will make an enormous change at low financial cost and enormous collateral benefit.

Encouragement of agricultural practices that reduce CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) and encourage the capture of carbon into soil systems.

Recognition of the importance of energy efficiencies and the built environment in fighting climate change. Buildings are responsible for approximately 40 per cent of the world’s current energy use and constitute about a third of our CO2 emissions. At the same time, global population continues to grow, driving urbanization and the need for additional housing stock. The opportunity for cost-effective reduction of carbon emissions related to the built environment through both retrofits and energy-efficient new housing stock is enormous and should be promoted and underpinned by appropriate legislation.

A pragmatic and systemic approach to promote investments into renewable energy and increase the flow of capital to clean and energy-efficient technologies. Businesses will only create jobs for the future, economic growth and fiscal revenue if there is greater certainty around policy and legislation. Ultimately, renewable energy technologies should be cost competitive with carbon hydro intensive technologies. But until scale has been achieved there is a need for feed-in tariffs and enforceable renewables targets for utilities. Similarly, there is a role for governments to participate in large-scale investments into grid parity and smart grids to enable renewable schemes to compete effectively.

Crucially, any delays or remaining areas of uncertainty in the wake of COP15 must not be allowed to deflect us from our responsibilities as individuals and businesses. No-one should be relying on Copenhagen to provide a “magic panacea” and much can be done independently of COP15, ranging from responsible consumerism and community projects, to local legislation and low-carbon initiatives. 

Business and geopolitical stability is critical for climate change resolution. For action to be effective engagement needs to happen without reverting to protectionist measures. Consumers and businesses need to become responsible in their choices and large-scale investment (both political and financial) is needed in solutions. It is, however, my firm belief that we can meet the challenges of climate change without compromising on growth and job creation. Let us not forget that, whilst climate change poses an enormous threat, it also presents many opportunities.

Stanley Fink is Chairman of Earth Capital Partners, a commercial investor with a specialist focus on environmental finance.



back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas/Fort Worth
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map