Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Reports
  • Brunswick Review Issue 6
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Research

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue one
Spring 2009

Overview of results


Comply or communicate? The best annual reports do both


Written by:
Richard Carpenter, Merchant, London

United States
American reports tend to be slightly less communicative than those in some regions due to the strict legal regime laid down by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. That said, some companies use this to their advantage. PepsiCo and GE are two longstanding exemplars of good, clear reporting, demonstrating how it is possible to communicate well while complying with a wide range of regulations.

PepsiCo
Packed full of statistics about PepsiCo, this report brings the company’s story alive. The Q&A section is well worth a look for its plain-talking approach to frequently asked questions. The investment story is told in the context of PepsiCo’s markets and the key performance indicators (KPIs) show how the company is moving towards longer-term corporate objectives. It is also very good at integrating the wider sustainability story into its reporting.
http://www.pepsico.com/Annual-Reports/2007/index.html

GE
GE starts off its report with a pertinent question: “What makes GE different?” It then sets out to answer this question throughout the report. This is exactly the type of investment proposition investors really look for: why GE stands out from the crowd, and why investors should buy into its overall strategy. The excellent “Letter to Investors” is an object lesson in clarity. GE also gives the report a strong forward-looking orientation.
http://www.ge.com/ar2007/index.jsp

France
Large French companies have traditionally not been the strongest when it comes to telling their investment story with, typically, too much focus on products ahead of strategy. Thanks undoubtedly to the increasing number of international institutional shareholders on share registers, this is starting to change. The investment stories of some French companies now really stand out from the crowd.

Pernod Ricard
The global drinks group tells its investment story well and puts the group’s businesses into perspective – there is a good “at a glance” and clear strategic insights from the Chairman and Managing Director. The “Four Major Strategic Focuses” section is a useful overview of where the management team wants to take the group, and builds on a readable analysis from Pierre Pringuet, managing director. The employee section is a tour de force of reporting on this valuable asset.
http://www.pernod-ricard.com/medias/resources/static/rapport_interactif/2007-11_uk/pernod_ra_2006_2007_ang/index.htm

Sweden
Scandinavian reports have generally been ahead of the game relative to most of continental Europe for a while. Sweden is no exception, with some excellent examples of integrated reporting that really explains the business. Swedish companies have been open to international ownership for several years – actively courting investors in the UK and US – and this shows in their reporting.

Volvo
Volvo links its overall investment proposition to its strategy and corporate responsibility – a rare approach for any company. One of Volvo’s real strengths is to show how it reacts to wider market trends, what its analysis of the global economy is – and what this means for its business. That is a reassuring starting point for any potential investor.
http://www3.volvo.com/investors/finrep/ar07/eng/index.html

Read more 1 | 2


back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • Rome
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Sao Paulo
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map