Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Reports
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Research

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue one
Spring 2009

Comply or communicate?
The best annual reports do both


Research summary
  • Review by Merchant of annual reports, corporate responsibility reports and websites of 223 of the largest companies listed on financial markets around the world
  • 11 countries and a wide range of sectors represented
  • Merchant criteria include core reporting elements, such as articulation of strategy, whether a reader can understand the business “at a glance”, and quality of segmental business reporting
  • Other added-value reporting elements, notably relationships with customers, suppliers and employees, and quality of corporate governance reporting, also examined

Written by:
Richard Carpenter, Merchant, London

Many countries have recently introduced International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for the first time, leading to larger, more detailed financial statements and a growing need to explain them. As a result, the front sections of annual reports, influenced further by the introduction in several countries of regulations governing the narrative content, have become more complex and more demanding for readers to navigate.

The danger of the ever-expanding report is that some companies forget the overriding reason why they report in the first place: to communicate their key messages. Good corporate reporting demonstrates to important stakeholders how the management team runs the company and at the same time involves disciplines and structures that should help management do that better. But the main purpose must be to communicate to external audiences. 

In Autumn 2008, in an effort to establish best-practice guidelines for practitioners, Merchant set out to review the annual reports, corporate responsibility reports and websites of some of the largest companies listed on financial markets around the world.

The results, set out below, show that the UK and Sweden consistently produce some of the best all-round annual reports. Germany is notable for the quality of its corporate governance reporting, France and South Africa for reporting on human resources and South Africa for reporting on supplier relationships and corporate responsibility.

What follows is an overview of some of the world’s major markets with a brief explanation about what makes some reports stand out, using our own benchmarking criteria. Reports, we believe, should express the personality and brand of a company. What is unique about the business? What is the investment story? Even though annual reports are supposed to be primarily aimed at investors, too many companies forget to give that audience a compelling reason to invest. A good annual report should cover the investment proposition within the first few pages – and make it clear how this story fits into the wider market context. That may sound easy but, in the pressurised corporate reporting schedule, it is all too easily forgotten.

See Overview of results

Unfortunately, in the rush to comply with IFRS and other regulations and legislation, many companies overlook the communications imperative. They end up with a report that meets all compliance requirements but fails to communicate an overall message that will inspire confidence among shareholders and other stakeholders. 

The examples described suggest that the best have one thing in common: they draw in the reader with a clear and compelling investment proposition. Telling that story is something that most companies and senior management teams do every day. If they do not put it clearly in the annual report, they will fail to meet the needs of their most important audience – their investors. 

Figure 1: Number of companies
reviewed by country (%)


View graphic


back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas/Fort Worth
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map