Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Reports
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Q&A feature

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue one
Spring 2009

Yelland: Turning to the Michael Wolff book (which I haven’t read in full…)
Murdoch: I haven’t read it either

Yelland: …he gives the impression that a lot of your acquisitions – BSkyB, The Sun in the late 60s, the original Fox network, and The National Football League – all happened by chance. What do you say?
Murdoch: BSkyB was pure vision. The Sun was pure vision. They said it was ridiculous at the time. But then they said only the Daily Mirror could sell like that. But we beat it.

I’m not sure you could put the NFL bid down to vision, but it certainly changed the game. Many people said we had overpaid at the time but we were right, dead right. We sensed that one of the owners of the NFL rights, one of the networks – CBS – was getting very tight about how they were going to bid for it next time. That deal absolutely made the Fox Network. You’ve got to realize that more than half our affiliates were little UHF stations like Channel 66 in Tucson. No one had ever heard of them, nobody ever went to them. But when the Dallas Cowboys were playing, the public had to watch them and they found the channels and that was the breakthrough.

Yelland: The Wolff book doesn’t talk about sport. It always seemed to me that sport was the power behind the expansion of broadcast here. The NFL, the Premiership in the UK, the Bundesliga for Premiere, the Italian league for Sky Italia and so on. It’s tribal, isn’t it? Do you think that’s understood sufficiently? 
Murdoch: Well, that’s just understanding what people want. You learn from newspapers that sport sells. It is the sport in the papers that makes people buy them. There’s a passion there. It is the great common denominator.

Yelland: Can I ask you about China?
Murdoch: China will open up. Starting slowly, but it will. Starting in two or three years when the next regime comes in. There’ll be things you can do there. There are things you can do now but it is all censored. We have big activities for Dow Jones: news wires and things like that. Business news wires. I like China.

Yelland: How do you respond to questions about succession?
Murdoch: It will look after itself.

Yelland: Are journalists too negative?
Murdoch: Too many are pessimistic, pessimistic about their own trade. They are worried about their jobs, for example outsourcing sub-editing to other continents. It’s incredible what’s happening. So if they are worried about their job security it’s entirely understandable. I don’t think that applies to a paper like The Sun. With The Sun you have a degree of security because of its success… and the flame haired lady walking in the corridor!7

Yelland: Everything that’s ever written about you talks about you as powerful. Do you feel powerful?
Murdoch: I think it’s hugely exaggerated. You can do things with the papers if you edit them. I think what I do is choose my editors. I choose my editors and then I watch them. What power have they got? They can set an agenda or they can turn up some scandal. But can they succeed in telling people how to vote? I don’t think they can. They can have views but it’s just part of the noise.

Yelland: Even the attack on the former British Labour leader Neil Kinnock in The Sun when it was edited by Kelvin MacKenzie? Did that not influence the outcome of the 1992 UK general election?
Murdoch: Maybe it did, maybe it didn’t. I don’t know. A paper like The Times can zero in on something, like it did on the recent business with the Speaker of the House of Commons and the police. The Sun can run an endless campaign like it has on a battered baby – and it can have an effect because it keeps at it.

Yelland: Can the world’s great media companies, including News Corp, survive the internet and even prosper from it?
Murdoch: Of course all media companies should survive the internet challenge although they will have to make many changes. The internet is still in its young days, both our response to it and our use of it will have to evolve.

Yelland: What next for News Corp?
Murdoch: Continued development of our great franchises.

Yelland: What is the achievement you are most proud of?
Murdoch: Probably Wapping8. I think it has led to the preservation of a vigorous and competitive press, which really doesn’t exist anywhere else in the world.

7 The Sun newspaper Editor Rebekah Wade
8 The east London print plant to which Murdoch secretly moved his UK newspapers in 1986, setting in train a revolution in the industry

Read more 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5


back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas/Fort Worth
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map